A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall obstruct fire-fighting, lifesaving, or first-aid services by using violence or intimidation to fire-fighters dispatched without justifiable grounds.

Nevertheless, on July 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received from the first-aid service staff member E of the 119 Safety Center who was dispatched after receiving a report from the Defendant, and was moving to the astronomical medical center of the 119 Safety Center; and (b) received the money from the E during the course of moving to the astronomical medical center, and without any justifiable reason, received the money from the son(the head of the convalescent hospital).

“Along with the mobile phone with a desire to take a bath, “A” was inflicted an injury on the victim E, such as brain-dead, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment to the victim E, at the price of the back water of E.

As a result, the Defendant committed violence to E, who was dispatched, thereby obstructing life-saving or first-aid activities, and at the same time inflicted injury on E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A self-driving letter (E members of emergency rescue service);

1. A written diagnosis for an injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (fuse of an emergency medical service crew, assault and video-fashion);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) of the relevant Act on criminal facts, Article 50 subparagraph 1 (c), Article 16 (2) and Article 16 (1) of the Framework Act on Fire Services (the point of interference with emergency medical services activities by assaulting fire fighters);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;

1. The sentencing criteria do not apply because they fall under ordinary concurrent crimes in the sentencing criteria.

2. According to the sentence, the Defendant reported and sent to the fire fighters, and the nature of the crime is not very good in light of the circumstances, method, object, etc. of the crime.

Although the defendant has been punished several times by violence, the crime of this case is also committed.