logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.02.06 2014고단2946
업무방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment of 10 months and fine of 600,000 won, and imprisonment of 8 months and fine of 600,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 2946]

1. Defendant A’s interference with the business of Defendant A committed a failure, i.e., committing an act of drinking at the Fju place operated by the victim E (V, 51 years old) at the window of Changwon-si.

On July 20, 2014, the Defendant found the Defendant, while drunk at the above Fjuk point on July 20, 2014, found the Defendant, and found the Defendant a defect that the Defendant would not sell alcohol to the Defendant, followed the tables, and laid down a 15-minute stop, such as cutting the beer and beer disease on the floor.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the principal operation of the victim by force.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act by Defendant A, upon receiving the above report from the said E, arrived at the said G District Unit located in the window I of Changwon-si, Changwon Police Station G District G District G District, in response to the demand for voluntary movement by the slope H belonging to the Changwon-si Police Station G District G District.

피고인은 같은 날 22:00경 위 G지구대 내에서, 위 H에게 “내가 뭘 잘못했다고 경찰이 출동하느냐, 개새끼야”라고 말하여 위 H이 피고인에게 주의를 주며 귀가할 것을 종용하자 위 지구대 입구 앞에서 “내가 무슨 잘못을 했는데 왔느냐, 개새끼야, 너희들 나이가 몇 살이야”고 말하는 등 약 25분 동안 고함을 지르고 욕설을 하여 술에 취한 채로 관공서에서 몹시 거친 말과 행동으로 주정하거나 시끄럽게 하였다.

[2014 Highest 3275]

1. On October 2014, the Defendant interfered with Defendant A’s duties, at around 02:0, the main point operated by the Defendant K (n, 40 years of age) in Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s main point business of the Victim K (n, N, 40 years of age). The Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s main point business for about 20 minutes, such as: (a) the Defendant’s business was under the influence of alcohol and went back to the main point while under the influence of alcohol; (b) the Defendant’s business was completed; (c) the Defendant’s business was at the end; and (d) any defect in returning the victim; (d)

2. Defendants A and B’s business interference with the affairs of Defendant A and B are conspireds, and the window of Changwon-si, around October 30, 2014.

arrow