A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of D Driving Schools, and E is the director of D Driving Schools who lectures the main business subjects, etc. of the said Institute, and agreed to pay the defendant KRW 70 million as a deposit for lease, and reflects monthly sales.

The Defendant, upon filing a lawsuit against the Defendant for the return of the lease deposit, had the intent to file a false complaint against E, and around August 2012, the Defendant prepared a false complaint against E using the computer at the G 14th higher private teaching institute office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

The accusation statement states that "E arbitrarily affixed a private teaching institute official seal on February 28, 201 and forged one copy of the certificate of employment in the name of the private teaching institute and submitted it to the H university around that time and exercised it." The defendant affixed the official seal of the private teaching institute on the form of the certificate of employment directly prepared by E, and there was no forgery of the certificate of employment.

Nevertheless, around August 16, 2012, the defendant submitted the above complaint to police officers whose name is not known at the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public service center of the Yeongdeungpo Police Station, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government.

In this respect, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having E receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination of the defendant's assertion and reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order

1. On February 28, 2011, the Defendant alleged that there was no fact that he issued a certificate of employment to E on February 28, 201, and that E, when the Defendant affixed a certificate of employment, the Defendant stated that he dialogueed that “I will not be forged with the name and the official seal of the Institute of Education. I would like to introduce a good university; I would like to prepare money at a clear value.”

this Court.