Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for two years, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Defendant A: (a) as if the Defendant had been on the same day and two under whose name the Defendant had been on the same day, forged a certificate of employment; (b) used it to obtain loans from a city bank; and (c) conspired to divide loans into two;

A. On September 2012, 2 of the false name boxes for forging private document: (a) written B’s seal prepared in advance on the certificate of his/her employment in the name column using a computer at a place where the location cannot be known; (b) written B’s seal prepared in the name column; (c) “A” in his/her affiliated column; (d) in his/her official position column; (d) from January 5, 2012 to September 19, 2012; and (d) in the company name column; and (d) affixed B’s seal prepared in advance on the certificate of employment that printed out into a printer.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of employment certificate in B, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. On September 20, 2012, the Defendant in the event of the above investigation document: (a) on September 20, 2012, at the outside bank main office located on the first floor of the building of fishing vessels, Jongno-gu Seoul Jongnoro 2, 89-27.

The certificate of forged employment, such as the statement in the port, was exercised as if it was duly formed to E employees of the counter who knew of that fact.

C. The Defendant was granted a loan of KRW 50 million from a foreign exchange bank at the date, time, place, etc. set forth in the above 1-B, and submitted a forged employment certificate, and the Defendant was pretended as having been in office D.

However, the defendant did not hold office in D, and there was no company in D.

The Defendant was granted KRW 50 million to the foreign exchange bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant, as a loan, from E employees of the counter of the foreign exchange bank.

2. Defendant B introduced to the Defendant two, who will be in charge of forging private document forgery, and thereafter, the Defendant and G forged a certificate of employment as if the Defendant and G were to have worked in the company normally and as if they were the two infinites (the same day of prosecution suspension).