logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.03.28 2014고정231
영유아보육법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a private child-care center in Jung-gu, Seoul.

No subsidy shall be granted, or any other subsidy shall be appropriated, by fraud or other improper means.

1. The Defendant: (a) conspired with D, D’s children E and F, who had retired from C’s child care center, to have been present as if they continued to attend; and (b) to pay the Child Care Fee Support with the Love Card; (c) around April 12, 2013, C’s office of C’s child care center E did not attend the child care center but did not attend the child care center; and (d) to pay KRW 220,000 with the Love Card for April 4, 200 as they attended the child care center;

4. From April 12, 201 to August 16, 2013, a child care allowance of KRW 2,200,00 was received in an unlawful manner, such as paying KRW 220,00 for April Child Care Fee Support for Melin F in the same manner, and paying KRW 440,00 for April Child Care Fee Support for E and F in an unlawful manner, etc.

2. The head of a childcare center in which at least 20 infants are nurtured shall not concurrently hold the post of infant care teachers (Article 17(2) of the Infant Care Act, Article 10 attached Table 2 of the Enforcement Rule of the Infant Care Act), but the Defendant, who is a physical team in the C childcare center around the end of August 2013, is unable to fill in the personal situation, instead of employing a substitute teacher, he/she shall have the head G entrust him/her with the physical team, instead of employing a substitute teacher, and received a total of 340,000 won by filing an application for a subsidy for the head and the fence teacher as shown in the attached crime daily table, such as 30,000 won for transportation and meal service expenses for infant care teachers and staff.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. CApplication of the details of payment of child care fees and the Acts and subordinate statutes on the details of subsidies;

1. Relevant Article 54(2) of the Infant Care Act, Article 54(2) of the Infant Care Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Article 1 of the Infant Care Act), Article 54(2) of the Infant Care Act, and Article 54(2) of the Infant Care Act, respectively,

arrow