logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.03.13 2017누70030
징수금 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the trial does not differ from that of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's claim even if the submitted evidence is reviewed together with the plaintiff's assertion, is justified.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for dismissal, addition, or deletion of part of the judgment of the first instance as follows 2. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Each of the “this Court” in the first, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, and fourth, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, and fourth, is considered to be “In Mancheon District Court.” The seventh, first and sixth, “transfer of claims to Korea Savings Bank and Gyeonggi Savings Bank and the above paragraph (d) are deemed to be “the foregoing paragraph (e).” The first and sixth, first, first, first, first is deemed to be “the rate of delayed interest” as “the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.” The fourth, fifth, fourth, second, fourth, second, second, fourth, second, fourth, and second, second, second, second, and fourth, the following is added. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff’s transfer of claims to the Defendant constitutes an act of disposal and the transfer of claims against the Defendant, which is invalid or invalid after the transfer of claims, and thus, the Plaintiff’s transfer of claims to the Defendant cannot be deemed to be invalid.

However, whether a cooperative is commissioned to collect from the head of the competent Si/Gun as seen earlier.

arrow