logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.07 2017나62471
사해행위취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The ground for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for dismissal or deletion as follows, and therefore, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance, "the defendant" in Part 17 of the judgment of the first instance shall be "the defendant shall be the defendant C in accordance with the agreement of this case."

Article 18 of the first instance judgment "A witness of the first instance court" shall be deemed "A witness of the first instance court" and "B" of this court.

Part VI through 9 of the first instance judgment shall be deleted.

The 6th judgment of the first instance court "the 1st preliminary claim cause" in the 10th judgment of the first instance court is "the 1st preliminary claim cause" and the 6th judgment "the 2nd preliminary claim cause" in the 19th judgment of the first instance court is "the 1st preliminary claim cause" and the 7th judgment "the 3nd preliminary claim cause" in the 7th judgment of the first instance court is "the 2nd preliminary claim cause".

The 7th judgment of the first instance court "abruption" in the 10th judgment shall be regarded as "abrut act".

"A judgment on the revocation of fraudulent act among the primary claims, the second preliminary claims, and the third preliminary claims" in Part 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be construed as "a judgment on the first preliminary claims and the second preliminary claims".

The part of the 8th judgment of the first instance, “the termination or termination of the right to collateral security of this case”, and the part of the 8th judgment to 9th judgment, shall be deleted.

No. 9 of the judgment of the first instance is "No. 4".

The 9th judgment of the first instance court is "...... judgment on the first preliminary claim" in the 11th judgment is "........ judgment on the main claim".

"Witness" in the 16th sentence of the first instance judgment in the 9th instance judgment is "a witness of the first instance court".

The 9th judgment of the first instance is in the process of the third preliminary claim.

arrow