The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the legal principle) posted the comments posted by the Defendant as if they were the facts of “bruption” which have not been objectively confirmed, and posted the comments to the persons who have doubtfully expressed the comments, thereby “H and I assault E” as if they were true.

Ultimately, the character of the Defendant’s writing is not simply an expression of opinion, but rather a statement of false fact that H and I assault E.

2. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) on June 17, 2016, from around 07:59 to around 13:27 of the same day, the Defendant: (b) connected the Defendant’s “F”, posted by E using “D” at a place in which the location cannot be known; and (c) on June 16, 2016, the Defendant used the Defendant’s “F” to access the Defendant’s “G G CCA” and used the Defendant’s “if it is appropriate for the Defendant to have properly understood the comments, H would be slick down, flick, flick, and flicked, and used the Defendant’s assault while taking a two-way bath.

As 2, as 1 man 2, the court is required to do so in the court, “h. H. H. H. so that 2 people who have to do so may play the legal assault of the elderly, but do not have any scam any fact,” and “if there is a crime of embling it, if there is a crime of embling it, it will be tried by the law.”

Of course, although all things are not revealed by the law, greging has the ability to enter the age to be considered as the aged even if greged.

Does it be justified for the reason that the violence against the elderly would be justified.

“K,” and “K, Igre, Igly

The problem is that it was not an important one, but an attempt to solve the problem by the violence of a person," "K S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S is not an actual assault, so it is easy that there is no false sign, "K S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S.