The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. On June 17, 2016, from around 07:59 to around 13:27 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) visited the Defendant’s C clinick (“G”) with “F”, posted by E using “D” at a place in which the location cannot be known; and (b) contacted the Victim H with “F” on June 16, 2016; and (c) followed the Defendant’s “F” with “GCA” to have properly understood the comments, if it would be appropriate for H to have properly understood the comments, H would be flick down and flicked to Korea; and (d) engaged in assault while engaging in I’s two desire.

As 2, as 1 man 2, the court is required to do so in the court, “h. H. H. H. so that 2 people who have to do so may play the legal assault of the elderly, but do not have any scam any fact,” and “if there is a crime of embling it, if there is a crime of embling it, it will be tried by the law.”

Of course, although all things are not revealed by the law, greging has the ability to enter the age to be considered as the aged even if greged.

Does it be justified for the reason that the violence against the elderly would be justified.

“K,” and “K, Igre, Igly

The question is that it is not an important one, but an attempt to solve the problem by the violence of a person, the issue is that K S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S is not a actual assault. At present, there is a word that it is a false sign, “K S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S

너 이러는 거 아무 보탬 안되니 얼렁 일해!!!!’, ‘ 이 J 저는 누군가가 누군가에게 법원에서 폭행을 당했다 이것만 봅니다

To that end, J posted a statement on the statement that he did not actually commit any actual assault, such as “Wron”.

However, the victim did not assault E.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

2...