1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, and G jointly and severally pay KRW 60,264,931,00;

(b) the defendant.

1. As to Defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, G, K, and L

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Defendant G, K: Article 208(3)3 (a) of the Civil Procedure Act (see Supreme Court Decision 208(3)2) other Defendants: Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (see Supreme Court Decision 208(3)2)

2. There is no dispute between the parties as to the corresponding part of the grounds for the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant H, I, J, M, N, andO. However, the Plaintiff respondeded to the Plaintiff’s claim of this case that “P died on September 16, 2016 and succeeded to Q and the above Defendants, and Q and the above Defendants inherited the property.” The Plaintiff did not object to the inheritance limit approval, and revised the purport of the claim and the grounds for the claim to that effect.

Therefore, the plaintiff's final modified claim against the above Defendants is accepted without dispute between the parties.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all.

(However, regarding the burden of litigation costs, Defendant H, I, J, M, N, andO, taking into account the process leading to the modification of the purport of the claim against Defendant H, I, J, N, andO, and the aforementioned Defendants are individually borne by each of them).