logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.30 2017가단5190167
소유권이전등기청구
Text

1. Defendant G: (a) on October 1, 1996, the real estate stated in attached Form 1 “List of Real Estate Shares by Plaintiff” 1 to Plaintiff A.

Reasons

The cause of the instant claim is as shown in the attached Form 2, and it can be acknowledged that the Defendants were led to confession or that the entire purport of the pleading is added to each of the entries in Section A1 through Section 7-2.

Although Defendant K asserted to the effect that it cannot respond to Plaintiff E’s claim because it did not explicitly include the pertinent shares in the name of Defendant K at the time of the sales contract with Plaintiff E, it is not acceptable as it is merely an independent opinion.

Plaintiff

F Based on the premise that Defendant M, N, andO inherited the property of the registered titleholder P according to his/her share of inheritance, the F seeks to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership to the said Defendants. However, according to the purport of the entire pleadings, the above Defendants may be recognized as having waived the inheritance of P’s property. Thus, Plaintiff F’s claim against the said Defendants is without merit.

Therefore, among the plaintiffs' claims, the claims against the defendant M, N, andO by the plaintiff F among the claims of this case are dismissed, and all remainder shall be accepted, but Article 99 of the Civil Procedure Act shall apply to the burden of litigation costs. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow