1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B, D, G, H, I, and J are each money recorded in the inheritance debt column in the separate sheet of the details of succession.

1. The description of the claim is as shown in the annexed sheet of the cause of the claim and the annexed sheet of the cause of the claim.

2. Full acceptance of the determination on the claim against Defendant B, D, G, H, I, and J: Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (abscamment made due to the absence of the Defendant)

3. Partial acceptance of judgment as to the claims against Defendant C, E, F, K, L, M, N, andO: A written reply and a preparatory document stating that the above Defendants obtained an inheritance-limited approval, and that the Plaintiff’s claim should be accepted within the scope of the property inherited from the network P, and did not appear on the date for pleading; and the Plaintiff did not dispute the fact that the above Defendants obtained an inheritance-limited approval, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim against the above Defendants was made under Section 1-B of the Disposition.

The same as the statement in the paragraph shall be partly quoted, but the cost of litigation shall be ordered to be borne by each person.

4. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B, D, G, H, I, and J is justified. Since the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C, E, F, K, L, M, N, andO is reasonable within the above scope of recognition, each claim is accepted, and the remainder is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.