Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B Under the name of C (B’s representative in the name of the victim D), a person who leased a 183.10 square meters (hereinafter “the instant store”) of the branch floor of the five-story building of the Gangseo-gu Seoul E&D reinforced concrete structure (hereinafter “instant store”) and operated the “Fudio wal-walon” business, and Defendant A is a person who is the friendship of Defendant B.

On May 31, 2011, the aggrieved party terminated the lease agreement on the ground that the overdue rent of Defendant B under the lease agreement reaches KRW 15,642,970, on the ground that the overdue rent was overdue, and on June 29, 2012, received a favorable decision from the Seoul Southern District Court on June 29, 2012 and received a favorable decision of the Seoul Southern District Court on the temporary injunction for the transfer of real estate (201Kadan5039).

Accordingly, on July 26, 2011, G enforcement officers of the Seoul Southern District Court attached a notice to the effect that “The debtor (C and B) possession shall be cancelled and the execution officer shall keep it in custody on the wall of the entrance of the store of this case by the execution officer upon the delegation of the creditor D on July 26, 2011 by the execution officer of the said court. However, on the condition that the present state of this real estate is not changed, the debtor may use it on the condition that the debtor will not change the current state of this real estate. The debtor may not move his possession to another person or change his title of possession. Any person may be punished if he damages or conceals this notice without the permission of the execution officer, or damages or conceals it, or damages its utility by any other means” (No. 2011A427) and “The creditor (D) applied for compulsory execution of the delivery of real estate, and if he fails to perform it voluntarily by August 3, 2012, the enforcement officer voluntarily attached the time of execution before the voluntary execution date.”

Defendant

B was anticipated to be subject to compulsory execution against the instant store by the victim, and the instant store is subleted to the Defendant A.