beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On May 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement and fabrication of private documents at the Daejeon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 13, 2015.
【Criminal Facts】
1. A thief, around December 2013, the Defendant: (a) obtained a victim’s personal seal impression issued at the office located in E in Seosan-si Office on December 18, 2013, which was used with the victim D; and (b) stolen the victim’s personal seal impression issued at the office of Seosan-si Office on the books of the said office.
2. On July 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had the victim D’s money KRW 250,000 from the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office’s Office of District Public Prosecutor’s Office embezzled the victim’s money; and (b) had the victim’s personal seal impression stolen, the Defendant used the victim’s personal seal impression to forge the victim’s borrowing certificate and the letter.
around that time, the Defendant entered title A4 in the paper using a computer in French paper, stating that “the tea card” is used, and the content stated that “D shall borrow KRW 2.50 million from A on December 18, 2013, and shall be repaid until December 30, 2013,” and the name of D shall be stated and the name of D shall be stamped and the certificate of loan shall be affixed to the victim’s name shall be forged, and the title shall be written in A4 as “each book,” and in the same manner, the title shall be written as “each book,” and the content stated as “D shall be repaid at the time of the completion of the payment for the construction work,” stating as “D shall be repaid at the time of the completion of the payment for the construction work,” and signed as “D’s name and seal affixed thereon, and forged one copy in each name under the victim’s name.”
3. On July 9, 2014, the Defendant, at the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office’s Office’s 205 Office, submitted to the investigator in charge a forged D’s loan receipt and a written statement to the effect that he/she would receive money as a repayment for claims against D, and that he/she would receive money as a repayment for claims against D, as prescribed in the foregoing paragraph (2).
Summary of Evidence
1.