The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment and 40 hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The most favorable situation is that the defendant repents his mistake and reflects his mistake, the amount of damage to the crime of fraud is not much, and there is a family member to support as the most.

However, the crime of this case is committed by forging documents under the name of the defendant, by deceiving the victim H's cell phone and causing a sense of sexual shame to the victim I using the same mobile phone, and it is not good in light of the Criminal Act. The defendant has been punished several times for the same crime; in particular, even if he/she was punished for a repeated crime due to the same crime, he/she has not been agreed with the victims up to now; the victim I had already suffered considerable mental distress due to the defendant's crime; there is no change in circumstances favorable to the defendant; there is no other special circumstance or circumstance that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower court is sentenced; the sentencing conditions for all the crimes of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, the circumstances and result of the crime of this case; and the sentencing guidelines for the establishment of the sentencing committee [the scope of forgery or alteration of the basic document of this case [the scope of punishment for six months or more] [the scope of forgery or alteration of the basic document / [the scope of forgery or alteration of the punishment [the scope of punishment for six months or more].]