A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2014, the Defendant around Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, made a resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Seo-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, in which the Defendant was operating, attached a photograph of the Defendant, attached to “D” and asked to create a fake resident registration certificate recorded as the birth in 1982. The above “D” was accompanied by a photograph of the Defendant in an irregular manner, and made a resident registration certificate under the name of “C”, “E”, and “E.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above “D”, forged one resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Seo-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu without authority.

2. On May 3, 2014, the Defendant taken the Defendant’s name and sent it to F via the Internet, on the following grounds: (a) on the Internet Kakao Stockholm, the Defendant made a false statement of the Defendant’s name “C” and the date of birth “1982 birth” to F, and (b) made a false statement of the Defendant’s name “C” and the date of birth “1982 birth” as in paragraph (1).

As a result, the defendant exercised the above resident registration certificate, which is a forged official document.

3. The facts were that the Defendant had been operating the leased shop, but there was no particular profit, and there was no intent to make profits by investing the money to the credit service provider when receiving the money from the victim F.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on June 12, 2014, proposed that the victim would bear the cost of the transfer, while making a private contract with the above victim, and the Defendant would bear the burden of the transfer cost, and the Defendant would have a corporate bonds company with whom the Defendant is aware of, and would have made an investment therein, bear the transfer cost by creating profits.

It is false and it was acquired by receiving 20 million won from the damaged person as investment money from the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the F’s statement in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the accused in the prosecution;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229, 225 of the Criminal Act (the use of forged official document) and Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.