logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 12. 13. 선고 2018두55111 판결
(심리불속행)관리 부실로 인하여 어민 이외의 자에게 면세유 출고지시서를 발급하였으므로 가산세 부과는 정당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2018-Nu-20580 ( October 20, 2018)

Title

The imposition of penalty tax is legitimate, as the duty-free storage order has been issued to persons other than fishermen due to poor management.

Summary

(The main point of the judgment) The issuance of a written order for delivery to persons other than fishermen due to poor management of tax-free oil, such as failure to verify relevant documentary evidence, etc., and there is no justifiable reason to believe that such failure is not attributable to the failure to perform such duties. Therefore, the imposition of additional tax

Related statutes

Value-added tax, etc. on petroleum products for farming, forestry, fishery and coastal passenger ships under Article 106-2 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act;

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2018Du5511 Decided revocation of Disposition imposing Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AAAA Cooperatives

Defendant-Appellee

BB Head of the Tax Office and one other

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 2018Nu20580 Decided July 20, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

December 13, 2018

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

arrow