logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.09 2018고단548
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the work of H SP car volume.

around 15:15 on December 11, 2017, the Defendant was proceeding from the station of the oil station in Hawa to the from the from the from the port of Hawa to the from the port of the port of Hawa.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service is a person who renders a way to reduce the speed and to check the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right are well and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the victim J (70 years old) who cross the crosswalk from the right side to the left side is not found, and the defendant's above spke driver's right side of the victim's spke car turn over the ground.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as three clothes in need of approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the said Act

On the other hand, there is no record of criminal punishment that the defendant had previously been subject to criminal punishment, and there is a violation of the perception and mistake of the crime of this case.

arrow