1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 23, 2016, the Plaintiff, who visited the Republic of Korea due to the bad faith of overseas Koreans residing in the U.S., was consulted with the Defendant, on the day (hereinafter “instant procedure”) after receiving counseling on the de facto marization procedure (i.e., the face face may be left after the procedure by inserting the medical room under the skin) from the plastic surgery operated by the Defendant, (ii) the de facto marization procedure (i.e., inserting the medical room under the skin), and (iii) the de facto marization procedure.

B. At the time, the head of the counseling office D of the Defendant Hospital explained to the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff was not marked a day, and that the practical scaming operation was not problematic for a week. He heard from the Plaintiff that he was scheduled to be a marriage axis after a day, and he was able to have the effect of the scambling operation, and he was able to have the effect of the scam and the effect of the scaming operation. The Plaintiff was determined to undergo the scaming operation on the day of the consultation.

C. On June 29, 2016, the Plaintiff complained of the Defendant Hospital for the name of face, frying, and pains, etc., and the Defendant, on June 30, 2016, took measures, such as cutting the procedure and frying the Plaintiff’s frying the fry to high frequency and cutting the Plaintiff’s fry, etc.

On July 2, 2016, the Plaintiff was scheduled to teach a stable, along with the spouse who is a malicious family, from the marriage ceremony of Dozin on July 2, 2016, but eventually, the Plaintiff did not attend due to a blicking, a pain, etc. and was not a spouse's stable.

[Ground of recognition] The descriptions and images of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 26, 31 through 34, the testimony of the first instance court witness D, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the parties concerned may lead a daily life, such as going out from the day following the instant procedure, to the Plaintiff before the instant procedure, and that is scheduled on July 2, 2016.