1. The defendant,

A. Attached Table 1 through 5 to Plaintiff School Foundation A, Plaintiff B, Plaintiff C, Plaintiff D, and Plaintiff E.

1. Details of ruling;

A. Project approval and announcement 1) Housing site development project (G, hereinafter “instant project”);

2) Project operator: Defendant 3 Notice: H on December 31, 2008, as notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, H, April 5, 2012, I, and J on December 24, 2012

B. Land subject to expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal on May 23, 2013 (hereinafter “instant expropriation adjudication”): Each land listed in the column for “land” listed in the annexed Table 1 annexed hereto (hereinafter “each land of the instant case”) (hereinafter “each land of the instant case,” and “by the sequence in order to specify it,” is either the instant ① or the instant land.

(2) Compensation for losses: 3) The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on July 16, 2013: A national appraisal corporation, a foreign appraisal corporation, or a foreign appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”)

C. The content of the adjudication by the Central Land Tribunal on April 17, 2014 (hereinafter “instant adjudication”): Each entry in the Central Land Tribunal, the Central Land Tribunal, and the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, and the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, and the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Objection Appraisal”): The fact that there is no dispute as to the ground for recognition, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as shown in the items of subparagraphs 1, 2, and 1 through 4 (including the serial number).

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) 6. The plaintiff F alleged the current status of the land of this case (Plaintiff F) obtained permission for the development of the land of this case and changed the form and quality of the land to the "site" lawfully. Since the actual state of the land of this case is "site", the defendant's entrustment of appraisal to the plaintiff F with the appraiser L of this court (hereinafter "court appraisal").

Among them, the amount of money calculated by deducting the amount of compensation determined by the adjudication of expropriation of this case from the amount assessed on the premise that the actual state of use of the above land is "site" and this.