1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 24,381,098; (b) KRW 34,106,604; and (c) KRW 3,206,250 to Plaintiff C and each of the said money.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Road projects (D Construction Works - Notice: E publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on August 22, 2014;

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation on July 21, 2016 (Articles 15 and 1128) - Land subject to expropriation: The land listed in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “land subject to expropriation”) and the land located in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant obstacles”) and the obstacles listed in attached Table 2 (hereinafter “instant obstacles”). Compensation for losses: The same shall apply as indicated in attached Table 3.

- Commencement date of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on September 13, 2016 - An appraisal corporation: A public appraisal corporation, and a new appraisal corporation in future.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on July 21, 2016 (No. 16 expropriation0312) - The claim for expropriation of remaining land: The Plaintiffs filed a claim for expropriation of shares of G 528§³ (hereinafter “instant remaining forest”), H 317§³, H 200§³, I roads, and J 180§³ (hereinafter “instant remaining road”). The Central Land Tribunal did not accept the claim on the ground that the use of each of the said land for its previous purpose is considerably difficult.

The Central Land Tribunal's ruling on objection (hereinafter referred to as the "adjudication on objection of this case") on January 19, 2017 - Compensation for losses: The phrase "amount of objection" in the attached Table 3 shall be as specified in the attached Table 3.

- Claim for expropriation of remaining land: It was rejected on the same ground as the adjudication of expropriation.

- An appraisal corporation: The conversation appraisal corporation, the Pacific appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "adjudgment appraiser," and the result of the appraisal is referred to as "adjudication"), the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and 11 (each number is included; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings, as a whole.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The compensation for losses determined by the plaintiffs' ruling of this case 1 is based on the market price of the land covered by this case and obstacles.