logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.03 2013가합30895 (1)
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The remainder of the Defendants except Defendant N are jointly engaged in:

A. Plaintiff A and 164,172,260 won among them and 100,000.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From March 2, 2010 to August 25, 2010, Plaintiff A (O) was a student who attended the first-class 5 of P High School from March 2, 2010, and Plaintiff B was the mother of Plaintiff A.

B. As of 2010, Defendant C, F, I, and L (hereinafter “Defendant students”) entered the same as Plaintiff A and P High School first and fifth grade students, and Defendant D, E, Defendant G, and H are the parents of Defendant C, Defendant J, and H are the parents of Defendant F, Defendant J, and Defendant M are the parents of Defendant I, Defendant J, and Defendant L.

At the time of 2010, Defendant students were able to live together with their respective parents (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant parents”) and were fully dependent on their parents in economic terms, and were protected and supervised by them.

C. Defendant Incheon Metropolitan City is a local government that establishes and operates P High School, and Defendant N, a public educational official under its jurisdiction, was a teacher of the first and fifth grade of P High School to which Plaintiff A and Defendant students belonged at the time of 2010.

Defendant students collectively bullying and bullying Plaintiff A from April 2, 2010 to July 20, 2010 as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant collective harassment.” A’s remarks consisting of the following: (a) the details of the illegal act in the temporary place of the perpetrator’s order C; and (b) the Plaintiff A, who was at around 13:00 on April 5, 201, who was likely to receive a cafeteria at school; and (c) the Plaintiff A, who was tightly and in

(B) Around 16:00 on May 26, 2010, the Plaintiff’s back-to-math game, which was melting snow with the Plaintiff’s back-to-math game, and the Plaintiff’s back-to-math (hereinafter “mathath game”). On May 27, 2010, at around 10:0, Defendant C had the face of Plaintiff A with the Plaintiff’s arms met, and Defendant C had the Plaintiff participate in the Plaintiff’s fighting with the Plaintiff on June 12:0, 2010, and had the Plaintiff participate in the Plaintiff’s conference on June 28, 2010 by threatening the Plaintiff’s arms and forcing the Plaintiff to participate in the Plaintiff’s conference on May 10, 201, and continued to participate in the Plaintiff’s conference on May 31, 201.

arrow