The Defendants jointly and severally share KRW 15,171,741, and KRW 3,00,000 for each of the said money to Plaintiff A and each of the said money to Plaintiff B and C.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff A (A) and Defendant DB (AB), G (AC), J (AD), L (AE),O (AF), R (AH), U (AH), and X (AI) were students of the first year and third grade of AK at the YJ at the time of 2015.

(hereinafter referred to as “Defendant students”). B.

Plaintiff

B, C’s parents, Defendant E, and F’s parents, Defendant H and I’s parents, Defendant H, and Defendant K’s mother, Defendant M and N’s parents, Defendant P, and Q’s parents, Defendant R R’s parents, Defendant S, Defendant V, and Q, and Defendant X’s parents, Defendant R’s parents, DefendantV, and W, and Defendant X’s parents.

(hereinafter referred to as “the parents of the defendant”) the parents of the above students.

From the beginning of the first semester in 2015, Defendant students collectively bullying or bullying Plaintiff A as follows.

(1) Defendant D neglected the Plaintiff’s opinion, including, but not limited to, “to assist in governance” when the Plaintiff presented his opinion while engaging in the activities of gathering the Plaintiff under the same Article with the Plaintiff A. When Defendant D was seated on the side of the Plaintiff A, Defendant D did not refuse to attach it and did not follow the Plaintiff’s book.

피고 D는 2015. 9.경 원고 A에게 “너 가장 친한 친구가 누구야 걔도 너를 가장 친한 친구라고 말하면 만 원 줄게”라고 하는 등 원고 A을 지속적으로 괴롭혔다.

(2) During the course of the performance evaluation, Defendant G was at the time of other Plaintiff A, and during the course of the academic conference, Plaintiff A was not in his own position and was pushed off and pushed off Plaintiff A without being able to have his own job, and around November 2015, Plaintiff A et al. appeared to have no lick during the class hours, and Plaintiff A et al. came to kn with pents from behind Plaintiff A et al.

Defendant G was engaged in the act of hiding and throwing away the articles on the Plaintiff’s books. Defendant G was engaged in an act of 3-4 times a week to Plaintiff A, and if the term “A” is the time-limit, the term “A” cannot be seen as a time-limit for the Plaintiff A.