beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 5,00,000 for Plaintiff A, KRW 1,00,000 for Plaintiff B, and KRW 1,000,00 for Plaintiff C, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties A is a student who was enrolled in a middle school, and the Plaintiff B and C are the parents of the Plaintiff A.
Defendant E is the father of Defendant D, the father of Defendant G, and H, the father of Defendant F, the father of Defendant J, the father of Defendant L and M, the parent of Defendant K, and the mother of Defendant N.
(hereinafter referred to as Defendant D, N, I, K, and F are “Defendant students”, and the remaining Defendants are “Defendant parents” for the purpose of convenience. The Defendant students who were enrolled in the first year of P High School were dependent solely on their parents in economic terms when they were living together with, or under the protection and supervision of, the said Defendant’s parents at the time they were serving for the said high school.
B. At around 16:30 on April 6, 2015, Defendant D, and F claimed money from Plaintiff A who used to play a game in the RPC room in QPC in the QPC building, but there is no money, and Plaintiff D, I, K, and F loaned money to S who used to play a game in the side of the Plaintiff, and then released 50,000 won in cash from Defendant D, I, K, and F, which were able to play a play in the said RPC on April 17, 2015. However, Defendant D, I, and F had Plaintiff A play a game at the said RPC bank on April 17, 2015, and had Plaintiff B installed a hPC with “grads in the camping,” and used a bridge and an assault and bridge, etc., and bridged and bridged by drinking and drinking.
3) On April 9, 2015, the Defendant student committed an assault, such as taking the Plaintiff’s breast part on the part of the Plaintiff’s chest at the 304-dong elderly playter, Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, and taking the leg (hereinafter the above harmful act, etc. collectively referred to as “the instant harmful act”).
4) As a result, Defendant students were referred to juvenile protection cases due to the instant harmful act, and were subject to a protective disposition.
C. Due to the Plaintiff’s diagnosis and treatment of the instant harmful act, the Plaintiff A’s treatment of the instant harmful act is a part of the inner body that requires the removal of the chest 8 main body, and four dypical treatment.