1. Defendant F shall pay Plaintiff A KRW 1,595,00, and KRW 1,410,000 to Plaintiff B, respectively, and KRW 409,00 to Plaintiff C, D, and H.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 2, 1986, the status of the Defendants Non-Party I Housing Redevelopment Association (hereinafter “instant partnership”) was dissolved on August 17, 2006 for a redevelopment project of the size of 1,765 square meters of Seoul J, K and L, which was designated as a housing improvement redevelopment district under the former Urban Redevelopment Act (repealed by Act No. 6852, Dec. 30, 2002) (hereinafter “instant redevelopment project”), with the housing redevelopment association (1,631 members) comprised of the owners of each of the said lands and buildings for the purpose of the redevelopment project of 1,765 square meters of land in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, K and L, 191,080 square meters of land (hereinafter “instant redevelopment project”).

Defendant G was appointed as liquidator of the instant association on February 27, 2007, and Defendant F was appointed as auditor of the instant association on June 7, 2007.

B. Plaintiffs A, B, and net M (the Plaintiff C, D, and H are the members of the instant association at the time of the establishment of the instant association. Plaintiff A, B, and M filed a lawsuit for the claim of unjust enrichment return from Plaintiff A, B, and M on the ground that the instant association obtained unjust enrichment from Plaintiff A, B, and M on the settlement money, etc., and filed a lawsuit for the claim of unjust enrichment return from the Seoul District Court Decision 2000Ga44367, Apr. 24, 2002, Seoul High Court Decision 2001Na301826, Seoul High Court Decision 2001Na30126, “The instant association received 10,166,617 won from the date of the appeal, and its related amount from July 4, 1995, 8,352 won from August 31, 199 to October 25, 205, each of them was repaid to the Plaintiff.

C. On December 24, 1992, the cooperative of this case prepared a management and disposition plan to implement the redevelopment project of this case, and received an approval plan for the management and disposition plan from the head of Seongbuk-gu Office, the head of Seongbuk-gu, the competent authority, following the resolution of the general meeting of the association members, and finally revised the five times on December 30, 2005, and finally changed the management and disposition plan from the head of Seongbuk-gu, the following (hereinafter referred to as the “instant approval plan”).