(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.01.11 2016고단7054

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.01.11 2016고단7054

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of a B beer cruise cruise car.

On October 25, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at the speed of 21:40 on October 25, 2016, and led the home fluor in front of the home fluor in the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the Gu of the city

At the time, it was difficult to take place after night, and there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent and negligent in neglecting and proceeding with a stop signal and received the front part of the Daltoba, which is driven by the victim C(20) driving at the crosswalk in the right direction from the left side of the running direction to the right side of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as mination at the bottom of the left-hand aggregate in need of approximately eight weeks of medical treatment due to the foregoing occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting a motor vehicle boom;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentence identical to the order shall be imposed in consideration of the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's negligence on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not show a significant number of reasons, and the victim was seriously injured, but the primary offender was covered by a comprehensive insurance, the fact that the victim has agreed with the victim, the recognition of the crime, and the fact that the mistake has been remarkably divided.

참조조문

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2017.08.11 2017고정585

-부산지방법원 2014.04.10 2013고정5547

-부산지방법원 2017.08.23 2017고정237

-부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.04.11 2017고단1369

-부산지방법원 2014.04.23 2013고단7000