logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.04.23 2013고단7000
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 15:10 on July 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven the volume of the B body-man car at approximately 50 meters in a section of approximately 50 meters alcohol concentration from a mutually influence restaurant located in the city of the city of the Busan to the tower in the city of the Gu of the Busan.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the Defendant has a duty of care to turn to the left at a speed of about 20 km from a speed of about 30 km to a new em in accordance with one way among three-lanes on the side of the apartment where the said vehicle is under the influence of alcohol of 0.122% of alcohol in blood at around 15:10 on July 201, 201, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.15:10% of alcohol in blood, the Defendant has a duty of care to prevent accidents by proceeding in accordance with the signals of signal apparatus.

When the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and went to the left due to the negligence of failing to perform the duty of care, and went to the left, the Defendant: (a) shocked the part on the right side side of the wing taxi in front of the ice 1st century, which was driven by the victim C (the age of 49) who was in progress pursuant to the process signals of the vehicle running in the Haststal Trata; (b) shocked the part on the right side of the Hastal cab; (c) thereby, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C in need of treatment for about two weeks; and (d) damaged property equivalent to KRW 2,043,257, such

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, without purchasing mandatory insurance at the time of a traffic accident described in paragraph (2). The Defendant operated the said passenger car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. A general medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (a point of driving under the influence of sound), and special cases concerning the settlement of traffic accidents;

arrow