logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.10 2016노1640
특수강도등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal, the credibility of the victim's statement can be recognized in light of the records of video records and telephone recording between the victim and the defendant, which were installed on the automobile at the time of the instant case. Therefore, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant on the charge of the instant facts charged

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant found the victim at around June 8, 1998, which was divorced on or around June 31, 2015; (b) the victim sought to return to the victim on or around December 31, 2015; and (c) the victim demanded that 300,000 won be delivered from the victim on January 3, 2016, “the victim forced the victim to return to the Republic of Korea; (d) the victim to return to the Republic of Korea on or around December 31, 2015; and (e) the victim to return to the Republic of Korea on or around March 28, 201; and (e) the victim’s knick and knick would be forced to return to the victim; (e) the victim’s knick and knick will be forced to return from the victim’s knick, and (e) the victim’s knick and knick will be forced to the victim’s.

The Defendant continued to drive the vehicle with the left hand by manipulatinging the driver vehicle and driving the vehicle on his hand with the knife the knife, and by threatening the victim to believe that the knife the knife 20,000 won of the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife. knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife. knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.). On the same day, at around 22:15, the Defendant made the victim to withdraw

arrow