logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.04.28 2016고정67
근로기준법위반등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant, as the representative C in Gyeonggi-do, operates a computer network repair business using four full-time workers.

Defendant Company was working in the said workplace from September 25, 2013 to March 25, 2015 and did not pay KRW 850,00 of the monthly wage of February 2015 to retired workers D, and KRW 2,341,930 of the monthly wage of March 2015 and KRW 2,772,464 of the retirement allowance within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement on the extension of the payment deadline.

The reason why the public prosecution is dismissed is a crime of non-competence, and the withdrawal of the complaint was submitted to the court to the effect that the employee D does not want the punishment of the defendant.

arrow