A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

Of the “C” projects within the prime corporate city, which was created in the prime city from October 201 to April 201, 201, the Defendant performed the said construction project while serving as the team leader of the said D company’s field at the site of steel, concrete, and rain construction subcontracted by the East Construction.

On November 201, the Defendant stated, “Around the above construction site, the victim E’s “F Manpower Job Placement Office need more human resources than the current number of human resources needed for the above construction work, support the necessary human resources for the construction work, and settle the said personnel expenses in the month following the month in which the said personnel expenses are worked, and in D, it is difficult to pay the human resources expenses from time to time to time to time.” The Defendant said that “A public official would pay the human resources expenses from time to time to time to time to time to the public and pay the personnel expenses from the public official and then by adding the interest to the public official for each payment of personnel expenses from D.”

Therefore, the Defendant and the victim agreed to immediately pay the victim with interest of 10% in addition to the interest of 10% when the Defendant was paid for personnel expenses in D later, by sending the victim a facsimile to the victim, stating the name and number of the workers who are placed in the construction site (the document stating the name and the number of the workers who are employed in the construction site, hereinafter referred to as the “Slas”) on the date of the construction work.

However, since February 1, 2012, D Co., Ltd. paid the direct personnel expenses to the persons participating in the above construction from the time when the Defendant did not need to pay the personnel expenses to the personnel members from this time, and even if the Defendant received the funds from the victims, there was no intention to pay them to the personnel members.