logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.07.19 2013고정1720
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 18, 201, the Defendant involved in the construction of a newly-built apartment in the vicinity of the B Station in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, concluded that “Around February 18, 2011, the Defendant would promptly pay the Defendant the Defendant the payment for the construction work of a new apartment in the vicinity of the B Station in Guro-gu, Seoul, with the F Company’s office for E- human resources operated by the victim D, for the construction work of a newly-built apartment in the vicinity of the B Station in Guro-gu, Guro-gu, Seoul.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the above labor cost in time even if he received the payment of the construction cost from the above FF company due to the cumulative labor cost of other construction works and the obligation to pay the related expenses.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim as such, received cash 334,000 won from the victim for the same day from the victim, and from around that time, the same year.

3. By the time of March 31, 200, a total of KRW 21,405,50 was received over 29 times, such as the list of crimes in the attached form as above, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On January 21, 2011, the Defendant involved in the G Apartment construction in the Cheongju-si stated that “The Defendant would promptly pay the Defendant the Defendant the payment for the said personnel expenses by adding the fee of KRW 10% to the said personnel expenses by receiving the construction expenses from the H company, if he/she first pays the personnel expenses of the parts necessary for the said construction to B.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the above labor cost on a timely basis even if he received the payment of the construction cost from the above H company due to the cumulative labor cost and the obligation to pay the other corporation expenses.

Ultimately, the Defendant is guilty.

arrow