logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.12.14 2016고단5925
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) and completed the execution of punishment on April 14, 2016.

On May 9, 2016, the Defendant reported on May 9, 2016, 2016, the term “gallonian No. 4” posted by the victim C on the “Sgallon No. 4” bulletin board, a medium-sized PC store in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the Defendant made a false statement that “gallon No. 4 will sell gallon No. 4 to KRW 200,00” by communicating the victim with a cellular phone.

However, the defendant did not have the above goods, and there was no intention or ability to send the goods even if he received the payment from the victim because he thought to use them as living expenses, etc. by receiving the money from the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 200,00 from the Defendant’s Nonghyup Bank account (D) on the same day as the price for goods from the Defendant’s Nonghyup Bank on the same day, and from August 24, 2016, by deceiving the victims over 21 times in total, such as the statement in the list of crimes in the attached Table of Crimes, and received KRW 1,923,000 from that time.

Accordingly, the defendant was accused of 21 victims and received a total of KRW 1,923,00.

Around September 6, 2016, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “The 2016 Highest 6823,” on the Internet bulletin board, “Niberian, sells E-Contacet.” The Defendant reported and contacted the above writing to the victim F, who “on the first hand transfers money, will send the ticket.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have a E-mail ticket to sell to the victim and did not receive money from the victim from the beginning, so even if he received money from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to send E-mail ticket to the victim even if he received money from the victim.

The Defendant is the victim as above.

arrow