The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, while lodging in the "E" operated by the victim, notified the members of the "G" Kaum's "G" Kaum's "E" to choose "E" as a accommodation facility, and published a true writing on the above Kapet bulletin board for the public interest solely with the intention of slandering the victim without any unfair treatment like the defendant. Thus, the judgment of the court below convicting the defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts or in the misapprehension of legal principles.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, namely, ① the Defendant, at the time of lodging in the “G” car page bulletin board, published a series of daily life information, such as film, massage, performance, etc., that would help the victim to determine the “E” as a accommodation facility by deceiving him/her, or forced him/her to leave the room; ③ the Defendant’s posting of a series of personal text messages exchanged with the victim beyond the degree of provision of information or opinion, up to the screen of the victim’s personal text messages; ② the “G car page” can be admitted only to 20 to 30,000 women, but the number of members is up to 40,000 women, and the Defendant’s writing was posted on the bulletin board of the above car page with the Defendant; ③ any member is able to read the Defendant’s text; ③ the Defendant’s posting of the “E” and the victim’s new text on the Internet website, etc., and the victim increased the victim’s online server and the victim’s comments.