A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2018, the Defendant was living together with the Defendant in his/her residence, when lighting around 05:10.

D In order to show D in his or her house his or her house while engaging in a verbal dispute, the person under the influence of alcohol has broken down his or her behavior.

“The 112 Report was made.”

The Defendant, at around 05:25 on the same day, and around the same day, on the ground that F, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report of 112, entered his house with the police officer F, who was sent to the scene, entered his house, and was in a dispute with the above police officer, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of report by 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, H, I, and F;

1. Determination as to the witness D’s partial legal statement and defense counsel’s assertion

1. The argument that the police officer's sexual conflict with F, which entered his house with the police officer F, was frightened by D, and that the police officer's sexual attacked to F, which led to D's wind to escape from D', and therefore, D's intention to interfere with the performance of official duties is without any intention to interfere with the performance of official duties, and the police officer's body did not contact F's body, so there is no fact that D's interference with the performance of official duties.

2. 판단 살피건대, 이 법원이 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, 당시 현장에 있었던 경찰관들은 피고인이 경찰관 F이 신발을 신고 집안으로 들어오자 항의를 하면서 위 F의 복부를 걷어찼다고

On the other hand, the defendant's statement was made by putting off D's words, and it was changed that D's words f's course toward the police officer F's words f's course on the wind that D's words f's course on the wind that D's words f's course. However, D's statement is inconsistent with the defendant's defense that the defendant's statement that F's entry into the house where the police officer's f's new requisitions at this court's right to call for the above F's course, f's course toward the police officer's own back to the back, and that it reaches the above F's direction.