The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant had no intention to steal the new outbreak due to the change of the new outbreak of a wave.

2. The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, are: ① the Defendant’s new launch of this case and the new launch and replacement of the reported price list after removing the price list from a rare place; ② the Defendant presented the price list to the cost of calculation when passing through the store calculation unit of this case, but the Defendant presented the price list. However, if the Defendant presented the price list, he did not confirm it and did not include it in the credit card settlement amount; the above store security personnel who supervised the Defendant, considering the Defendant’s movement, did not consistently present the price list from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the trial; ③ the Defendant stated that the price list was included in the Defendant’s bank when he attached the Defendant along with the calculation unit; ③ the sum of goods purchased from the above store of this case and paid with the card of this case is merely KRW 91,120, and the Defendant’s new sale price of this case can not be known to the Defendant’s new sale price of this case from 800,000 won.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.