Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

From April 2016 to August 2016, the Defendant: (a) demanded that the fourth floor C members of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu building E, which was operated by the victim’sO, visit the C member of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Council to “a request to refund the cost of creating the mold and cancel the contents of the claim for insurance money for the manufacture of the mold” to the effect that “a request to return money KRW 2,00,000,000,000 from the stolen money and to return money.”

1. On May 29, 2018, at around 10:00, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s dental treatment by force for approximately 20-30 minutes, such as: (a) the Defendant: (b) laid the floor through stick while having a large number of patients and dental employees; (c) throwing the victim’s name; and (d) throw the victim’s name; and (d) throw the victim into large sounds, “Thing KRW 2 million.”

2. At around 10:00 on May 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) placed a large number of patients and dental employees in the foregoing place; (b) placed the victim’s name on the floor with a large sound; and (c) placed the victim’s name at the top of the stick; and (d) “Domine typ.

2.6

It is why the police station has fleded.

Theft 2 million won between theft and theft

“In the meantime, she interfered with the victim’s dental treatment by force for approximately 20 to 30 minutes of the disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witnessO;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each complainant's written opinion (Nos. 4 and 5 once a year);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the same Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate social rules, even if the defendant's act is recognized.