logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 06. 20. 선고 2017두38256 판결
(심리불속행) 망인은 사망 당시 망인의 형제들에게 채무를 부담하고 있었다고 봄이 상당함[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2016-Nu-22797 ( October 03, 2017)

Title

(C) It is reasonable to deem that the deceased was liable to the deceased’s siblings at the time of death.

Summary

(C) In light of the above legal principles, it is reasonable to view that the deceased’s act of selling real estate and selling it to the extent that the deceased’s act of selling it is reasonable to deem that the deceased’s act of selling the real estate and selling it to the extent that the deceased’s act of selling it is reasonable to deem that the deceased’s act of selling it was necessary to pay the deceased’s punishment at the time of death.

Related statutes

Article 14 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act (Public Charges, etc. Deducted from Value of Inherited Property)

Cases

Supreme Court-2017-Du-38256 ( October 20, 2017)

Appellant

○ Head of tax office

Appellee

○ ○ ○

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court-2016-Nu-22797 ( October 03, 2017)

Imposition of Judgment

on October 2017 06

Text

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow