logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 05. 31. 선고 2017두35912 판결
(심리불속행) 양도인의 신고 취득가액과 전양도자의 양도가액이 상이하고 양자 모두 실지거래가액으로 볼 수 없는 경우 환산취득가액으로 산정함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2016-Nu 20630 (2.03, 2017)

Title

(C) If there is a difference between the transferor's reported acquisition value and the transfer value of the transferor, and if both parties are unable to view it as the actual transaction value, the conversion acquisition value shall be calculated.

Summary

(C) The original disposition that calculated and determined the conversion acquisition value by deeming that the actual transaction value is unclear if the transferor’s acquisition value is different from the transaction value, etc. reported by the former owner, and both parties cannot be seen as the actual transaction value.

Related statutes

Article 114 of the Income Tax Act (Determination and Revision of Tax Base and Amount of Transfer Income Tax)

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the allegation in the grounds of appeal by appellant is not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow