A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 6, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million from the Jeonju District Court's Eup branch office (hereinafter referred to as "the 56 years of age") to assault the victim C (hereinafter referred to as "the 56 years of age") on the criminal facts that inflicted an injury on the victim C.

On September 26, 2015, around 00:40 on September 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was a victim returning home in front of the “Eppp” of the victim’s operation in regular Eup/Eup/Myeon; and (b) the Defendant told the victim that “if the Defendant does not leave, she would be dead, discarded, or discarded, she would not live in his/her mother.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Investigation reports (the contents of recording at the time of reporting by the victim and related to attachment);

1. 112 reported statements and replies;

1. Determination on the victim Handphone 112 reported photographs, on-site photographs, Defendant, and defense counsel’s arguments

1. The summary of the argument is the fact that the defendant had passed before the victim's Eppline while he had completed a campaign at the time stated in the judgment and returned to the house. However, there is no fact that there was no fact that the victim was a victim at the time and there was no threat as stated in the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court: (i) the victim was at the time stated in the judgment at the police and this Court, and (ii) the victim was at the time stated in the judgment and returned home to the police and this Court, and the victim was at large sound, such as the victim’s immediately behind the judgment, and the statement in the judgment that the victim followed the victim.

A statement concerning work is made by the victim, ② in this court, the victim stated that “I will see why I will drive the victim and take a bath,” and that “I will see why I will see I will do so on the hyth of this year? I will see why I will do it on the hyth of this year? I will see. I will do it on the hyth of this year?” ③ The victim reported 112 at the date stated in the judgment, and was hidden in the F. Mypt nearby, and at the time.