A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2] The Defendant was in a de facto marital relationship with the victim C (n, 63 years of age) for 15 years, but at present, was in a de facto marital relationship with the victim C, and was issued a decision on a protective disposition with the purport that the Defendant would not access the victim’s residence within 100 meters from Geumcheon-gu Seoul Family Court until October 5, 2018, which was the victim’s residence until October 5, 2018.

around 14:25 on July 2, 2018, the Defendant, at the center of “F” operated by the injured party in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, for the sake of having been threatened with intimidation and assault from the Defendant, had the victim requested the reporter to report, and had the police officer made a statement of damage, and had the victim expressed his/her statement to the police officer.

Around July 22, 2018, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender and released, and thereafter, the Defendant’s “F” is located adjacent to the main point of “F”, and the victim returned home to the Republic of Korea. From around 21:56 on the same day, around around 21:56, the Defendant: (a) accessed the victim’s home in front of the residence of the victim located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul; (b) made the victim have access to the victim’s home and let the victim’s left hand; and (c) on the contrary, the victim who resisted to this point will die.

“.....”

As a result, the defendant assaulted the victim for the purpose of retaliation against the victim's report and statement in relation to the investigation of his criminal case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal writing of the witness C;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor and police with regard to C;

1. Each written statement of C;

1. The victim's photograph, his photograph, his photograph, and the list of 112 reported cases (the defendant and his defense counsel did not assault the injured person as stated in the facts constituting the crime, and found the injured person for the purpose of compromise with the injured person, so there was no purpose of retaliation.

The argument is asserted.

However, according to the evidence of the judgment, the following circumstances, i.e., the victim's crime.