logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.06.07 2018고단1525
사기미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant developed the “D” production program around December 12, 2017 and registered the copyright with the Korea Copyright Commission, as the representative director of the KGE, a virtual currency D production company located in the B1st floor in the Gyeongbuk-si, Gyeongbuk-si, Gyeongbuk-si, 2018.

1. Around June 2017, the Defendant, in the course of creating a private document forgery, the event of the above investigation document, and the attempted fraud, had the representative G of the said company, which was known to “F” on the company’s website, expressed the Defendant’s financial resources by forging and suggesting a statement of the transaction of the passbook as if there is a big balance in the Defendant’s agricultural bank, and had the Defendant receive an investment in the said Bank of Bank Co., Ltd. and

A. On August 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) used a computer slickner at the office in the aforesaid office in the KFFE to enter the transaction details in a blank page (H) which is not entered in the transaction details; (b) then arbitrarily entered the transaction details of approximately seven reduction using the slicktops program; and (c) arbitrarily entered the balance into “7,50,000,000,000” and printed it using the slickter.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a copy of the head of the Tong in the name of the Nonghyup who is a private document to prove facts.

2) The Defendant: (a) taken photographs of the details of the transactions of the passbook forged at the same time and at the same place as above in the above paragraph (1); and (b) transmitted such forged facts to G through the mobile phone Kakao Stockholm case as if it were a document duly formed.

B. On November 14, 2017, the Defendant forged a private document and held the aforementioned investigation document 1) around November 14, 2017, using a computer slicker at the office of the KFE, the Defendant, using a computer slicker in the above KFE office, carried out a letter of transaction details on a blank page, the transaction details of which are not written, among the head of the FFC (H), in which the transaction details are not written, into the Defendant’s NF computer, and then carried out the image.

arrow