Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and a fine of 2,00,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 17, 2015, at around 23:10, Defendant A 2015, at the D main points located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, he drinked Defendant B and performed drinking alcohol with Defendant B, followed the table, etc., and did not go back even though he/she was able to have the Defendant returned, the background and F of the E zone belonging to the Bupyeong Police Station E zone, and the background leading up to the Defendant called up on the floor. Defendant A saw the f to put him/her up on the floor, and she took a bath to the effect that he/she would bring it up, and “W kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kn

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted F and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 제1항 기재 일시 및 장소에서, 경찰관들이 위와 같이 누워서 행패를 부리는 피고인 A을 잡아 일으키려 하자 “니가 뭔데 우리 남편을 잡냐!”라고 소리치며 경위 F의 얼굴을 밀치고, 이를 말리는 경위 G에게 “니가 뭔데 개새끼야”라고 욕설하며 G의 얼굴을 손바닥으로 때리고, 정강이를 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted F and G, thereby obstructing the police officer's legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Defendant B of the ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In the case of Defendant A with reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, the crime of this case was committed during the suspended execution period, and the degree of crime cannot be deemed to be weak, but there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime. In the case of Defendant B, the situation where Defendant A, who had the front of his/her marriage, reports that Defendant A was subject to restraint to police officers, thereby causing the instant crime.