Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인들의 공동범행 피고인들은 2015. 4. 12. 15:05경 인천 남구 D에 있는 E식당에서 함께 술을 마시던 도중, 피고인 B이 E식당 앞 노상에서 차량을 주차하던 피해자 F의 처 G에게 아무 이유 없이 욕설하여, 피해자 F(52세)이 “왜 내 아내에게 욕을 하냐”라고 항의하자 화가 난다는 이유로, 피고인 A은 피해자의 머리채를 잡은 채 주먹으로 얼굴을 1회 때리고, 무릎과 발로 옆구리를 수회 걷어차고, 피고인 B은 이에 합세하여 발로 피해자의 옆구리와 다리를 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim and brupted the left-hand side of the second brush, which requires about six weeks of treatment to the victim.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 2014. 4. 12. 15:20경 제1항 기재 장소에서 신고를 받고 출동한 인천남부경찰서 H지구대 소속 경위 I가 적법한 절차에 의하여 현행범체포한 후 피고인을 순찰차에 태우려 하자, “야 씹새끼야. 죽을래.”라고 욕설하면서 발로 I의 복부를 2-3회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted I to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

3. Defendant A, at around 15:20 on April 12, 2014, sent a report at the place specified in paragraph (1), sent the following: (a) the police officer of the H District of the Incheon Southern Police Station, who was called “I to arrest an offender in the act of committing an offense; (b) show that I would like to walk one’s hand and walk one’s hand; and (c) “I would have to go from the host player; (d) he would not arrest him; and (d) carried flaps and hand boms and hacks.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted I to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Each police statement of I and G;

1.The Act and subordinate statutes, such as a suspect Fison photo and diagnosis report.