logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.02.08 2017고단839
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) found the victim E in front of the D cafeteria located in Pyeongtaek-si C on March 15, 2017, about KRW 300,00,00 in the market price of the victim, the victim E parked, and (b) led by using the cres without the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

On October 19, 2017, the Defendant found the victim F's erroneous land that was parked at the edge of the entrance of the apartment parking lot No. 43 18 p.m., 43 p.m., 15:03 p.m. on October 19, 2017, 2089, and Hatoba owned by the victim from the above Hatoba, left off the theft preventioner (or equivalent to 40,000 U.S.).

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 839"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A photograph of the damaged ozone part, each internal report, and each investigation report; and

1. The photograph of a police seizure protocol and a list of seized articles, a photograph of seized articles and caps, and a photograph of a criminal image and a caps, and the CD "2017 top-down 2089";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Each CCTV photograph material, field photograph, investigation report, CCTV image material at the scene of the crime [the defendant and his defense counsel thought and brought about the defendant to be the victim E-owned dynas, so the defendant is not guilty.

However, according to each of the above evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant can be found to have intentionally stolen the above filial duty, so the above assertion by the defendant and the defense counsel is not accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows, and the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and post-crime.

arrow