All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Indictment

1. Defluence;

가. 피고인은 2015. 2. 12. 23:20경 경기 파주시 B에 있는 피고인의 집에서 피해자 C이 피해자의 트위터(D)에 ‘A 그 사람 원래 그런 사람입니다. 저와 E, F을 엄청 씹고 있습니다’라는 글을 게시하자, 화가 나 트위터 팔로워 58,797명 등 불특정 다수의 사람들이 자유롭게 접속할 수 있는 자신의 트위터(G)에 피해자에게 ‘원래 성폭행범이지요 ,ㅋ 장난하나 ’라는 글을 게시하였다.

B. Around 03:00 on February 13, 2015, the Defendant posted a letter “F’s sexual indecent act, C, sexual assault, and sexual assault,” on its Internet page (H) through which many and unspecified people can freely access at the same place.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim two times.

2. On February 13, 2015, the Defendant posted a letter that “C covers his/her fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluor,” at the above place.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through information and communication network with a view to slandering the person.

Judgment

1. The facts charged in paragraph (1) of this Article are crimes that can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Articles 312(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act. Since the victim cancels the complaint against the defendant after the prosecution, this part of the indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

2. The facts charged in this part of the facts charged are those falling under Article 70(1) of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., and prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under paragraph (3)