logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.06.20 2017고단5166
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(음란물유포)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 2016, the Defendant used SNS, such as Twitter (D) and Twitler (E) in the name of “C”.

1. On November 2016, the Defendant, in relation to the public display of obscene videos, taken pictures using a camera, etc., on the face of a sexual intercourse with the mouth of the mouth, anus and anus, sexual intercourse, sexual pets, etc., with his/her permission, after talking a man in the name of a man with the word “T”, mainly used by male same-sexs, at a non-permanent place in Gwangju (hereinafter referred to as “T”).

After that, on the 28th day of the same month, the Defendant posted a video image that had a military uniformed man’s sexual organ and petence to allow many unspecified people who have access to the above account through the Internet on the Twitter account used by the Defendant at the office of the Defendant, 106-dong 502, Seo-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju, to view the above account.

In addition, from that time until May 21, 2017, the Defendant posted 275 obscene video images on the Twitter and twiter account where men have sexual intercourses, sexual intercourses, etc. with the old lecture, sexual intercourses, and pets, etc., and twitter and twiter accounts where men have sexual intercourses, twitter and twiter accounts, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant displayed obscene images openly through information and communications networks.

2. The Defendant related to the sale of obscene videos, as in paragraph 1, posted a video image, etc. with which male same-sexs have sexual intercourse, and had them contact with an unspecified number of people that they want to have the video originals, decided to sell the video and raise profits.

Accordingly, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “a person who wishes to purchase the original of the above video” in the foregoing Twitter and Twitter used by the Defendant, “A person who wants to purchase the original of the above video” in the Defendant’s name (hH) and then the original image of the video is exposed to people.

arrow