logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.01.16 2019고정2179
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 4, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on June 12, 2018 by the Incheon District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving).

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant planned to attract the customer to sell B and BMW X5 car to 38 million won, and if the victim decided to purchase it, the Defendant demanded the above BMW car to pay a high-priced additional price for the above BMW car and let the victim waive the purchase, and then induce the purchase of another car.

Around July 12, 2017, the Defendant and B reported that in the “D” used cars trading complex located in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the actual trading price of approximately KRW 67 million was KRW 10 million and the registration fee of KRW 28 million was sold to the victim E in 2016-type BMW X5 car, and had the victim E receive the victim’s rocketing car with approximately KRW 16,500,000 in the market price and sell the above BM car under the condition that part of the price was repaid, the Defendant and B made a false statement as if he were to sell the said BM car under the above condition.

After that, the Defendant and B have to pay to the victim the purchase price of the BM passenger vehicle with KRW 95 million in lump sum or with KRW 5,500,000 in monthly installments. Since a certificate of acceptance has already been already written, it is an alternative to the price of the BM passenger vehicle even if the condition is not written,” and “or, at the same time, if the price of the BM passenger vehicle is not possible, the purchase of the BM passenger vehicle can be cancelled. In other cases, if another vehicle is purchased, the purchase of the BM passenger vehicle may be cancelled. Instead, the Defendant and B made the victim without any other intention to purchase the other vehicle to purchase the vehicle with KRW 850,000 in KRW 8.5 million in advance, and caused the victim to continue to purchase the vehicle under the name of the victim’s MM passenger vehicle and the market price of KRW 165,500 in KRW 160,000 in KRW.

arrow