The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

1. On April 18, 2018, the Defendant stated that “I will pay 12.5 million won including principal and interest until May 30, 2018, the Defendant loaned 15 million won to I, if I would like to lend 1,5 million won to I, and if I would like to lend I, I would like to I would like to pay 1,250,000 won including principal and interest until I would like to receive 1,50,000 won from I would lend us 300,000 won to I would like to pay us.” In addition, I would like to see that I would have loaned 1,250,000 won to I would have sold us with the revenue of 1,000,000 won from I would have borrowed 30,000 won from I would have to pay us the principal and interest of 300,000 won from I would have borrowed 30,000 won from I.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he was thought to use it as repayment of the outstanding amount and personal living expenses, and he did not have an intention or ability to repay the amount promised to the victim by scambling the amount equivalent to KRW 10 million, or by importing or selling malicious scams.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was transferred from the victim to the SC Bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant’s wife E on the same day, KRW 10 million, and KRW 20 million to the same account around May 2, 2018.

2. The Defendant asserts that, in general, the Defendant did not lend a specific work only when it takes place, and that, in order to borrow money from the victim, the Defendant considered that it would be possible for the Defendant to comprehensively use it for the business that the Defendant was in charge of, and that the amount equivalent to, the cost of the business, such as preparing exhibitions, was used, and that the Defendant did not deceiving the victim.

3. According to the facts charged, the contents of deception in the act of defraudation of this case are as follows.