Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced by the Incheon District Court to imprisonment with prison labor for six months as a result of the crime of interference with business, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 27, 2015.

On April 24, 2015, the National Democratic Labor Union Federation (hereinafter referred to as the “National Labor Union Federation”) held the “National Labor Union Workers’ Federation” among the participation of 20,000 members, etc. in the Seoul plaza located in Tae-ro 2 in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu from around 08:0 to 24:00. On April 24, 2015, the organization held the “Korea Labor Union Workers’ Union Federation” from around 16:00 on April 24, 2015 to from around 18:00 on April 16:0, 2015, and reported that two-ro 2 of each class of the Seoul Squa-ro Ro-ro Ro-gu, Seoul Squa-ro Ro-ro Ro-gu, and that two-lanes of outdoor assemblies will move along using two-lanes in the direction of proceeding to the Seoul Squa.

Accordingly, from around 13:30 on April 24, 2015 to around 16:45 on the part of around 8,000 members, the Korean Civil Labor Group held the “Private Labor Competition” to the society of the Republic of Korea in Seoul Snoman B from around 13:30 on April 24, 2015, and approximately KRW 7,000 of the participants in the above assembly began to run along the way before the moving direction at around 16:45 on the same day, on around 16:45 on the day on which approximately 7,00 persons among the participants of the above assembly began to run by using the way before the moving direction at the Seoul Smare. However, around 17:16 on the same day,

The Defendant participated in the said Korean Workers' Competition Act on April 24, 2015, while occupying approximately 3,00 participants from around 18:13 to 18:36 of the same day, and the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jong-ro 1 has occupied the intersections over the intersection.

Accordingly, the defendant conspiredd with approximately 3,00 participants in the assembly and interfered with transportation by land for about 23 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report criminal records, fine records, and results confirmation;

1. Article 185 of the Criminal Act and Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;