1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the conjunctive claim against Defendant Hocom Construction Co., Ltd. is dismissed.

2. Defendant.

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is an autonomous management organization consisting of occupants pursuant to the Housing Act for the management of 8 units, 648 units, and their ancillary facilities, etc. of the Hoban-gun of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-si, the 211-1 unit for profit-making (hereinafter referred to as the "the apartment of this case").

Defendant Ho-Ben is a project undertaker who constructed and sold the apartment of this case. Defendant Ho-Ben Construction is a construction company that contracted and performed the new construction of the apartment of this case from Defendant Ho-Ben, and Defendant Ho-Ben's housing guarantee is a guarantee company that entered into a warranty contract on the apartment of this case as follows.

On November 28, 2007, the conclusion of each of the instant guarantee contracts and the pre-use inspection conducted by Defendant Hoburon entered into a contract with Defendant Hoburon to pay the warranty bond within the scope of the period and amount indicated in the following table (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant guarantee contracts”) where Defendant Hoburon fails to perform its obligation to repair defects arising from the instant apartment.

After November 29, 2007 to November 28, 2008, 571,359,210 from November 29, 2007 to November 28, 2007, to November 28, 2007 (2 years), 571,359, 2103 from November 28, 2007 to November 28, 2009 (3 years) 857,038,8164 from the 2007 autonomous management body of this case was modified from November 28, 2007 to November 28, 2007 (the 5th year), respectively, the Plaintiff was organized from November 29, 2007 to the 10th 5th 207 autonomous management body of this case (the 205th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 2007).

The construction of defendant Hocom Construction does not construct part of the apartment of this case that should be constructed in accordance with the design drawing.